I can't comment on how Quebec deals with that problem, so I won't deal with that. I think Professor Houle would have been a better witness for that.
In terms of having adjudicators who are part of the public service, I've been talking about having more GIC appointees, or respecting the independence of GIC appointees. I'm not sure if your question is whether or not there is a conflict there. I think that Professor Houle last day went through quite succinctly talking about Matsqui and the other cases, showing that there is an argument for a higher level of independence. Yet, of course, the fullest level of independence would come from GIC appointees. There seem to be many different factors that could have an impact on the work of the decision-makers who are public servants, and that seems to be a bit concerning—