I want to clarify that the amendment we're voting on now has no timeline for the presentation of a plan to the committee, so there is no firm obligation. I would suggest that's because there is no plan, as has been demonstrated by the government's inability to answer basic questions on this. I would suggest that government voting down these two subamendments, which put some timelines around this, suggests that again, there is no plan.
On October 2nd, 2018. See this statement in context.