Okay. Thank you.
Very quickly, the way I looked at it, despite it being a very long report with 65 recommendations, was that there were four significant buckets of recommendations.
Number one was to strengthen the management of the asylum determination system, but horizontally. I spoke to that earlier. It's very important for IRCC, IRB and CBSA to understand how the system functions as a whole from beginning to end and that we have common situational awareness of what is working well and what is not working so well, so that we can marshal our resources and our attention to those areas that actually require correction.
Number two, Mr. Yeates suggested that we explore machinery changes that would integrate some of the functions related to the asylum determination system into one separate new agency: some of the intake, first-level decision-making, pre-removal risk assessments, voluntary returns and, interestingly enough, some aspects related to international resettlement.
The third bucket that Mr. Yeates referred to is funding. We've talked about that and the significant need to secure funding for both the backlog and new intake, because the A-base the IRB has, our base funding, is at a certain level and the current intake is much higher than that.
Last is process improvements. Where can we find the noise in the system, the duplication and inefficiencies, and streamline it?
Those are the four buckets. In many of those areas, we're already advancing.