I understand that question to be about the balance between publicly supported and privately sponsored or community-sponsored refugees. I think the data clearly shows that community-sponsored refugees do better on a variety of integration outcomes, and we also get this really important impact on our communities. My first answer, then, is that robust community engagement is a good model. We should be very dedicated in Canada and globally to trying to get more communities involved rather than tightly held, professionalized, government-funded models.
That said, as with any policy, a whole bunch of pieces have been put together in Canada. Currently, Canada does most of its UNHCR-referred refugees through a government-supported model. I don't want to suggest that my preference for broad community engagement is also a preference for named refugees over UNHCR-referred refugees. I want to distinguish those elements of the Canadian program. I think it's clear that engaging citizens is very positive. I don't think that necessarily means the front-end stream has to be aligned the way it currently is in Canada.