The compact is explicit that it is not legally binding and that one of the guiding principles throughout its operation—as was said by my colleague, Ida, from ACT Alliance—is that it takes full account of the sovereignty of states to determine their own national migration policies.
That is recognized in paragraph 15 as one of the guiding principles. I will read it to you, because that statement is as clear as it can be.
The Global Compact reaffirms the sovereign right of States to determine their national migration policy and their prerogative to govern migration within their jurisdiction, in conformity with international law. Within their sovereign jurisdiction, States may distinguish between regular and irregular migration status, including as they determine their legislative and policy measures for the implementation of the Global Compact, taking into account different national realities, policies, priorities and requirements for entry, residence and work, in accordance with international law.
That, madam, is the clearest statement about the recognition of the role of national sovereignty in national decision-making, but that concept is also picked up explicitly in many other parts of the compact.
My last statement about that is that contrary to some press reports, there is absolutely no obligation in this agreement to take anyone into a country without the explicit authorization of national authorities.
Thank you, madam.