Thank you, Chair.
I'm a bit confused. I've heard from you that the agreement is not binding, but then I've heard that if it wasn't ratified by everyone, then activities couldn't be coordinated, and then I just heard that Canada would be required to reflect upon or implement principles where there aren't principles. There was one policy change suggested here with loan forgiveness.
If it's not binding but Canada would be required to make changes, does this mean that the UN would basically assign rapporteurs to kind of disparage Canada or question its sovereign policies if it wasn't in alignment with the global compact, if signed, in the future?