Bosc and Gagnon is fairly clear on rules of order and decorum, and you just made a good, pointed speech around casting aspersions on people and proceeding with decorum. I realize that my colleagues might be frustrated by the fact that I come to meetings prepared with relevant questions that the minister has perhaps not replied to, but to characterize the pursuit of information in the parliamentary committee as “theatrics” is like, to have a prime minister who's a feminist, to say that, it's a little fake to me.
I just want to put it on the record, in terms of my colleague responding to my point of order, to make him perhaps have a thought about his language. Maybe I'm just better at my job, but I reject that term and I would ask him, in his point of order, to apologize. Thank you.