I have one comment.
I always feel it's common sense for anyone to learn from their own journey. It's smart to learn from others' experiences.
I did negotiate drafts with state members in Geneva on the global compact. We did suggest.... One of the ironic things in the global compact is that when that started, the main issue of it was to increase and improve the resettlement. The final draft of the project actually turned not so much to this as actually sharing best practices.
When you refer to withdrawing from the agreement, for me it's withdraw from what? Is it to withdraw from actually learning from other nations that are doing something good and just not doing it and being stuck?
When I discussed topics with Germany or Ireland, it was really inspiring for them to learn what's working well in Canada and for me to learn what's working well over there, and that maybe we can share that.
We contributed to the draft the meaningful participation of refugees—Muzna and I—at that point. We contributed the fact of improving the data collection on refugees and hosting countries, and overseas.
Yet we keep saying that it's an unbinding agreement. It is an unbinding agreement. To be honest, it always boggles my mind every time I hear that someone is withdrawing from this. It's just withdrawing from learning best practices.