We heard yesterday that they're going to use some of the VACs as well to try to spread the message, but obviously one person in a country such as India is not a huge amount of resources.
My submission on behalf of the Canadian Bar Association last time I was here was that when you just say that only lawyers can represent for a fee, it's such a simple message that you could put it on a form. You could put it on a form in multiple languages so that people understand.
People unfortunately don't get that they're hiring people who are calling themselves lawyers, or maybe they're calling themselves people who are authorized to practise overseas as ghost consultants. Maybe they're saying, “Don't worry about it; I'm a travel agent and I can do this”, or whatever.
If the message is really that only lawyers can represent for a fee, it's a very simple message and you can say, “You can look up your lawyer”, and even provide a link.
It could even be right on the forms. That's the best way to deal with the ghost consulting issue, otherwise what's going on now and propping up this whole thing is going to be here for years. For years and years, we're going to have this ghost consulting problem. You're never going to get rid of it otherwise.