Certainly I think we want to be efficient. What we're looking at is taking care of some of the administrative burden to allow for access to care. Some of the stuff we're looking at will not be a big investment. We want to make sure it's efficient.
We talked about administrative controls. These are things like allowing for bitewings. It's interesting that they'll cover for a full mouth series, which is 16 periapical films, and two bitewings, but I just need the two bitewings to determine if there are cavities. The other ones don't really help me. They'll pay for the whole envelope of it, and they just don't understand that those are the ones I need. It would actually decrease costs by having that as a stand-alone fee.
The issue with stainless steel crowns, which have a very similar cost to a large amalgam filling, doesn't make sense. It's not the standard of care that we would do that. It would be something we would find unacceptable in any other cohort. We just wouldn't do it, and the cost is the same.
To sum up, we're looking at efficiencies, I guess, not a big envelope of money.