No, we have a specific scope of study. If the committee wishes to go beyond the existing scope that was agreed upon, that is a decision for the committee to make. Perhaps for clarity I should read through the points of the scope of study:
1. The engagement of Canadian individuals and groups in the resettlement effort; including programs funded by Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada in order to facilitate integration into Canadian society as well as how that funding was distributed;
2. Integration challenges facing the resettled refugees and how they could be addressed, including:
a) Proximity to family in Canada;
b) The availability of employment counselling and placement services, as well as the experience of...refugees attempting to enter the job market;
c) The availability and cost of permanent, affordable housing and the transition from temporary to permanent housing;
d) The access to and transition into appropriate educational programs for refugee children;
e) The need for and availability of English as a Second Language...and French language programs;
f) The type of medical support needed and the timeliness of what was provided;
3. Resettlement capacity of destinations for Government Assisted Refugees and Privately Sponsored Refugees;
4. The different federal programs (Government Assisted Refugees, Privately Sponsored Refugees, and Blended Visa-Officer Referred refugees) for refugee resettlement and any differences in resettlement support and initial outcomes as well as the programs in Quebec;
5. Opportunities for family reunification under the One Year Window.
That is what was agreed upon as the scope of our study, so I'm ruling that has moved quite a distance beyond the scope of study, and I—