With respect, they are not adequate. Clearly, the determinations that we made inside are for inland refugee claimants. But for those who are abroad, overseas refugees, settlement processes are mired in bureaucracy. Those who are internally displaced simply do not meet the test for convention refugees until they flee their country of nationality.
Now the source country assessments that were made before, which have now been suspended—we ran out of time on that—I think ought to be re-engaged or reinstated. It's something that this committee certainly should look at, in terms of how we can designate certain countries where that methodology can then be utilized to secure a safe passage out for those people.
If I may briefly comment on the R2P concept, the responsibility to protect, if it's expanded or hybridized to the point where Canada says, yes, that responsibility is to see if we can engage with the country of nationality to secure safe passage, that's a methodology that's worth exploring.
To answer your question, no, it's not adequate right now.