Yes, Mr. Virani, there is definitely a requirement, in my view, for an entrenched definition of IDPs, or internally displaced persons. In that sense, as I indicated earlier, the responsibility to protect doctrine I think ought to be hybridized to some degree so that Canada and other entities can extract those in significant harm's way, for reasons that would allow them to meet the convention refugee test if they are outside the country.
On July 18th, 2016. See this statement in context.