Well, as I mentioned in my recommendations, I think there is a need for strong advocacy with the Government of Myanmar to make sure that they are committed to addressing the situation and finding a solution to resolve at least the situation of the Rohingya, which includes, of course, citizenship, freedom of movement, and resettlement or relocation of these people to their place of origin. As I said, as you can understand, it's not going to be easy. But the advocacy part, to put pressure on the Myanmar government not to fall short on this, is absolutely important—and, of course, supporting, perhaps financially, the provision of services. I understand there is a big shortfall in funding both from the WFP and.... When I was visiting, I was told that the rations were going to be cut down because of lack of funding. I think Canada already contributed, but perhaps it could increase some contributions, or at the same time.... I don't know. It has to be seen in Myanmar, of course, how best to help. But the international community also have produced a “Rakhine Response Plan” to try to get some funding for different activities, not only food, health care, education for the children, but also for water and sanitation, etc.
As you know, also, there was a head of mission group set up in Yangon after the election in 2015, which is led by the Danish ambassador, but also with the participation of the U.S. ambassador, the EU, Australia, and Turkey. Interestingly, Canada is not part of this. They have tried to get a common message to the government. I know that the two key messages from these discussions have pushed for freedom of movement and access to services, and also that the citizenship issue be addressed. It is trying to get a common platform to join that advocacy by government, the diplomatic community, as well as by the UN agencies and international NGOs in Myanmar.