I thank all the witnesses for their presentations.
I'd like to add a number of other suggestions for consideration by the government, just as we've heard from many witnesses on this important issue. Here are my thoughts. One is for the government to take immediate actions in response to the declaration that genocide is being committed, and that under section 25 of the IRPA on humanitarian and compassionate considerations, we support the recommendations of the witnesses to immediately begin bringing Yazidis to Canada, with an ultimate target of 5,000 to 10,000. I would recommend that in the very near term, utilizing the databases compiled by the groups who have appeared here, that 3,000 to 4,000 could be brought to Canada, and that they include victims of genocidal actions such as human trafficking, sexual slavery, rape, torture, and widowed women, and orphans. Also, it is estimated that there are 3,000 to 4,000 Yazidis in the Turkish camps right now, and action needs to be taken with respect to them. Due to the extraordinary event that is genocide, groups brought over in response to a genocide would not count as part of the immigration prime levels, so as not to prevent other individuals from making legitimate claims.
On the question around humanitarian aid, significant food shortages have been identified in refugee camps in the region, and the asks are quite light in that regard, in fact. They are asking for flour, rice, and oil. Electricity by way of generators is also a significant issue, due to the extreme conditions like heat. Medicine and clothes are also issues in terms of the immediate need for humanitarian aid. It was also brought to our attention that there are issues with the distribution of humanitarian aid due to corruption and discrimination, and that the aid is not reaching the most vulnerable. In light of that, the government should work more closely with credible, established NGOs in the region to deliver the aid directly into the camps.
There was also an ask from the Yazidi groups that appeared before the committee—and this took place in a private meeting with me, so it wasn't before the committee—for direct cash resources to be provided to the victims. They were recommending $1 million of direct cash resources to be spread amongst the Yazidi population as an initial action.
There's the issue of processing delays. Canada still lacks the ability to process cases in northern Iraq, which is where many Yazidis—amongst many other refugees—are located. The UNHCR has already processed many of these peoples and it is the additional Canadian screening slowing everything down, because it cannot take place as we have no processing centres there.
On best practices abroad—and this was brought to our attention by the representative from the UNHCR—we could actually waive the Canadian processing process to expedite the arrivals of families and adopt that best practice of other jurisdictions in this regard. For family reunification cases in Canada, this additional level of screening only occurs if significant flags are raised, so if advocating for the waiver of the whole screening is not acceptable, then I would suggest that it apply only in cases where screening cannot be done. I ask because it's creating such delays.
For the LGBTQI community, there are an estimated 63 countries in the world that criminalize people based on their sexual orientation and gender identity. This discrimination and vulnerability coded in law is different from vulnerability due to conflict, and in many cases if a person leaves their country to be able to make a refugee claim, it puts them in an even more vulnerable situation because they end up in another country that criminalizes them, and where they have no supports. So their leaving could also put their families at risk. Providing a program similar to that of the source country class program, but one that is more adaptable and responsive, would allow individuals to connect with Canadian NGOs, to makes claims in Canada or with local groups on the ground while still being in their country of origin. There are human rights organizations that could assist in that regard.
And we recommend the creation of a subcommittee to continue to work on internally displaced persons for solutions in the future.
Those are some of my thoughts on how we can move forward in the immediate sense, in addition to what my colleague, Ms. Rempel, has provided.
I wonder whether or not those are items you would support as well.