I would agree, again, with the earlier panel that it needs to be repealed, and I know the government has made a commitment to doing that. I think that's the right thing to do. I don't think there was a need to bring that provision in. It was brought in, it was part of a package, together with the issue that I was speaking about, the change in the test for a genuine marriage. They amended this regulation about genuine marriage. They brought in conditional and permanent residence. It was all part of the perceived epidemic of fraudulent marriages that were succeeding here in Canada.
I think that was a manufactured concern. I don't dispute there are some marriages of convenience that take place. I think the tools to catch them were there, and I also think that, if at the end of the day, the odd marriage that perhaps shouldn't have snuck through does, if that is the cost to make sure that genuine spouses are together, then that's what needs to done. Because as it stands right now, spouses in a marriage that the Federal Court has said is absolutely genuine are permanently barred from being reunited in Canada because a finding is made that at the time of the marriage, immigration was a motivating factor. And that's unfair.