Thank you to the whole panel. It is very insightful, various aspects of it.
I want to first ask either Mr. Langford or Ms. Thomson a question.
The Canadian Bar Association has twice written papers that I know of requesting that IRP regulation 4, the bad faith conjunctive test, to not amend it originally, and then I guess to say that it was affecting a lot of people in a negative manner. In my riding, and I know after consulting many other MPs as well, the conjunctive test “and” versus “or” has been a challenge.
How many would you estimate, based on your network of people or applications, are hinged on this bad faith test, where their marriage is still considered genuine, but it might fail on the part that it was for the purpose of entering Canada?