Thank you.
My next question is for Ms. Desloges.
I want to thank you and welcome you back. You've been here before and your views are always insightful.
I actually like your idea about the family. I come from one of those joint families. My parents lived with me. My father has passed away now, but my mother still does. For us, that's the only way we've ever lived, so it's kind of a norm. I agree that I've seen it more now since the time and the difficulty to get parents has escalated from the past, and economic disparity is not as bad as before from some of the countries our traditional immigration patterns come from. A lot of people who have permanent residence are wanting to go back because of that anxiety.
What I want to ask, regarding your proposal of having a nuclear family be expanded to include dependent parents, if perhaps the income requirement on that would be more. I'd like to hear your opinion. Maybe it should be less for those who have younger parents, as you suggested, those in their fifties, or 55, say, who can be employed here, who can learn how to drive, be less dependent on their children, versus those who are perhaps 65 to 75, who would obviously face more challenges. Do you think the test for financial requirements for that would be different between the two, that those who are younger, perhaps, have a lesser requirement by the sponsor versus those who are older or past retirement age, the legally defined age, perhaps, of a higher threshold? Could you elaborate on that?