—to help—
Evidence of meeting #54 for Citizenship and Immigration in the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was question.
A video is available from Parliament.
Evidence of meeting #54 for Citizenship and Immigration in the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was question.
A video is available from Parliament.
Liberal
Conservative
Michelle Rempel Conservative Calgary Nose Hill, AB
Thank you, Mr. Chair.
The Canada Gazette posted the statement that the net cost to Canadians of lifting the Mexican visa initiative will be $261.9 million. Why has the government proceeded with lifting the Mexican visa in light of this particular piece of information?
Liberal
Ahmed Hussen Liberal York South—Weston, ON
Thank you for the question. I will defer to my officials for the answer.
Associate Deputy Minister, Department of Citizenship and Immigration
Thank you, Minister.
The member is correct that the net monetized cost for the lifting of the visa, net of the cost and the benefits, is $260 million over 10 years. However, those are the quantified costs—
Associate Deputy Minister, Department of Citizenship and Immigration
—and if I could just complete, there are additional—
Conservative
Associate Deputy Minister, Department of Citizenship and Immigration
Excuse me—
Associate Deputy Minister, Department of Citizenship and Immigration
There are additional benefits that have not yet been quantified.
Conservative
Michelle Rempel Conservative Calgary Nose Hill, AB
With regard to the supplementary estimates, $13 million has been allocated for the lifting of the Mexican visa requirements. Was this figure included in the $261.9 million that was quantified in the Canada Gazette?
Associate Deputy Minister, Department of Citizenship and Immigration
In terms of the supplementary estimates and the main estimates, the costs, I believe, were $4 million and $1.3 million. Those operational costs are for increased traveller screening, increased processing of eligibility claims for asylum seekers, and interim federal health benefits. To answer the member's question, yes, they were included in the costs.
Conservative
Michelle Rempel Conservative Calgary Nose Hill, AB
With regard to that, can the minister please provide an estimate of the cost differential between one government-assisted refugee from the Syrian cohort and one privately sponsored.... Actually, no, there's a better question. This year, of the additional cohort coming in as government-sponsored refugees, how many of those will be LGBTQ from Iran, Yazidi refugees, or persecuted ethnic and religious minorities?
Liberal
Ahmed Hussen Liberal York South—Weston, ON
You have asked three questions. I don't know which one is more of a priority, so I'll just go down the list.
Liberal
Ahmed Hussen Liberal York South—Weston, ON
In terms of the LGBTQ2 community, we work very closely with the UNHCR, with private sponsors, and with other stakeholders to make sure we identify vulnerable populations to be resettled in Canada. That obviously includes members of the LGBTQ2 community. We continue to do that. We have a policy of vulnerability as a check and, obviously, membership—
Conservative
Conservative
Michelle Rempel Conservative Calgary Nose Hill, AB
With the five seconds I have remaining, is it correct, sir—
Conservative
Michelle Rempel Conservative Calgary Nose Hill, AB
—that the government has not set a target for LGBTQ communities [Inaudible—Editor].
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Borys Wrzesnewskyj
Unfortunately, the time has run out for this round of questions.
We'll proceed to Ms. Kwan, please, for seven minutes.