I don't want to take up too much of your time but I'm part of the solution. Answer number one, Ms. Stone already told you that they're struggling with the interpretation of section 91. The way it stands, settlement agencies cannot advise on immigration, period. That's the interpretation.
The Canadian Bar Association recommends that section 91 be amended to have only lawyers represent. In other words, it is also suggesting eradication of settlement agencies.
Answer number two, alternatively when we're looking overseas, yes, I've studied all three models, and the Canadian model is the best model. The final solution, again, is to give the current regulatory body more authority than simply to regulate its members so it will have the authority to put a dent in the activities of the unregulated.
Thank you.