That's the question I have. There are consultants who are completely outside the jurisdiction, people in different countries. There are foreign consultants who are retained by Canadian consultants, and then there are the consultants who simply do work in this country.
On the issue of fraud—which I think is in the area of what Mrs. Zahid was talking about—obviously, if there is immigration fraud that can be proven, we have jurisdiction over those who are in this country. Then we get to the next level, where a Canadian consultant hires a consultant in China, for example. Do we have jurisdiction? Does this country have jurisdiction to deal with that type of fraud, where someone is retained in another country?