I've seen some of the arguments, and the arguments are good. Good lawyers make good arguments. Janet makes spectacular arguments. I don't agree with her on everything today, but she's very well spoken.
When you're in a situation where someone has been convicted in Canada beyond a reasonable doubt and they've already had all the protections under the charter, then for Parliament to say there should be a process that can revoke their citizenship, I think is proper.
If the Supreme Court disagrees with me, I think they're going to have a bigger say than me. But until the Supreme Court disagrees with me, this is my position. Actually, it might still be my position after they disagree with me as well.