I agree that changing back to the age range that is proposed in the bill.... Frankly, if we have a concern about individuals being employable here, then let's deal with it at the immigration process. These people have already lived here for four years under the current law, three years under the old law, maybe longer.
Sometimes I question why there's a language test at all for citizenship. If we have a concern about bringing in people to work and study and live here, we should address it at the immigration point of entry. If we've decided that family-class immigrants don't need language requirements, which I think is the correct thing to do, then why do we make them write the test and spend the money? It makes no sense to me.