It's two separate questions.
In terms of the analysis, it needs to be measured for those people who are admitted. What actual expenses did they incur? Does it match up with what the projected cost was, or not?
Also, are people complying with their mitigation plans? We don't need to go on a witch hunt, but simply to study and get more data, because I agree with what Mario says. You can't make big decisions like this in a vacuum. There need to be numbers associated with that.
The second thing is the cost-benefit analysis. All of that can be done within the context of the humanitarian and compassionate analysis. Those arguments can still be made.
With exceptional people like Professor Montoya, there's a way to make those arguments, and the existing regime is enough to accommodate that.