It's an excellent question. To the point we made in our brief, there is no evidence to date that people are not complying with what they have offered.
To Ms. Desloges' point, I believe if that data were to be collected—and we suggested a pilot project of a certain number of applicants being tested to see what happens—it need not be intrusive. It need not be discriminatory. It would give us some evidence, because part of the problem right now is that there are a lot of assumptions being made, and the issues are just too critical. The fight to get to the Supreme Court and beyond has just been too hard for us to simply say that the law should be changed; let's do away with everything. It's a very fragile position we find ourselves in today.