That's correct.
My position is not that there shouldn't be revocation in these circumstances but that there should be a more rigorous process and that people shouldn't be put in a more precarious situation when they become citizens. In the example that I gave of the engineer with a misrepresentation from 25 years ago, when that person shows up in my office and asks me if they should become a citizen when they know they've misrepresented and there's not much they can do about it, my advice to them is to not become a citizen, because their situation will become more precarious once they become a citizen. Once they're a citizen, if an officer decides they've misrepresented, they will go all the way back to being a foreign national—an inadmissible foreign national—and they can be removed with no process.