I think this goes back to a critical point that I'd just like to underscore. The code is about how members conduct themselves, their behaviour in the hearing room. It's not about the merits of individual decisions. Concerns about inconsistencies in outcomes are properly a matter addressed through the judicial review process, as well as internally through processes like training members on issues. Discussion among members about inconsistencies is actually the most effective way to reduce those inconsistencies. That's not the same as malfeasance or bad behaviour in the hearing room, or treating someone without sufficient respect.
