I was not aware of the amendment. That is why I simply asked that we postpone it, so that we can debate it and come to an agreement. I am far from wishing for the minister not to appear before the committee. So I don't see how I could be accused of partisanship on this issue.
I was simply not aware of the amendment. I think it is reasonable to debate it a bit later in order to come to a consensus instead of wasting our time and, more importantly, making witnesses who are here waste their time on account of “procedural wrangling”.