I think that's one of many, right? The lifeblood of immigration is discretion. I would never ever want that to be taken away, but over the last while, with this emphasis on expediency and trying to get things processed as quickly as possible, often decisions are made in a way that really harms people and doesn't take into consideration their real situations. In the context of family, like I said in my opening remarks, I don't think that section should apply at all for someone who is the subject of a spousal sponsorship, and not just in that but in an adoption. For anything that relates to family unification, I don't think it makes sense to apply that. The number of fraudulent situations is astronomically low. It's not enough to justify that measure, and I think it should. I think it's a great idea to reverse the onus.