I finished the wording of the motion, Mr. Chair.
In the ruling that you're about to make on whether or not this is in order, I would argue that this is exactly the nature of the issue we're dealing with.
As you can see by the original motion, it actually says, “the committee undertake a study on the implications for Canada of the measures announced by Donald Trump during the U.S. presidential campaign regarding the deportation of persons who are in the United States”, and “the Canadian federal government's plan to ensure border security and compliance with...immigration statutes and policies.”
My amendment to this deals with the United States and its immigration policy. It expands on it by adding some additional components to it, but it is consistent with the thrust of this motion, which, centrally, is about the U.S. presidential campaign plan to massively deport people in the United States and the Canadian government's plan for how it's going to deal with it.