That's correct.
Just to be clear, the reference to 109, a tabled response, means that there could be no debate on this in Parliament or concurrence in the issue for a substantial amount of time, which means that there would be no way for Parliament to act on this report until almost the end of the year. I think a requirement for the government to respond by letter to this committee prevents us from having that four-month delay.
Just in hearing some of the conversation, my understanding is that it's a number of sitting days, not just.... Maybe the clerk can clarify Standing Order 109 and how that applies. I just think that we can give ourselves the greatest possible opportunity to move this forward at a parliamentary level, while also requiring a government response by letter. I think that's the best way to proceed.