I had one more point to make. We strongly support this motion. I think it's very important. I think it's excellent. I want to congratulate my colleague for bringing it forward.
We have one minor change to suggest to further clarify paragraph (c). We recognize that there are significant problems with the UNHCR refugee determination process in certain contexts, including in the context of the Uighurs. I think all members recognize that there is a need for a determination process to occur, but that there are some issues in this particular case.
We're not calling for the abolition of a determination process, but we do think that there needs to be a recognition of the flaws in the process as they currently apply. Just to be clearer about that point, I would propose replacing the word “waive” with “replace”. Paragraph (c) would read, “replace the UNHCR refugee determination.”
I think that's very much consistent with the intention, but I do think the existing language can maybe be read a couple of different ways, so I want to propose my wording for discussion as a possible amendment.
Thank you.