Section 22(2) on dual intent explicitly says that the intention to remain in Canada does not prevent a foreign national from becoming a temporary resident, upon proof that they'll have left Canada at the end of the authorized period of stay, yet the vast majority of the people rejected are rejected on the grounds that IRCC does not believe that they will leave at the end of their stay.
Isn't that a direct contradiction of dual intent? What action needs to be taken to fix this dual intent problem?
I'll ask Mr. Tao and then Mr. Dangzalan.