If we were to suspend it and it were no longer in force, then, obviously, the purposes of the safe third country agreement would no longer be there.
Hence, yes, there is a concern held by some that in suspending the agreement, there would be a pull factor. Nobody knows.... I shouldn't say “nobody knows”. Instead, there are projections; there is some conjecture associated with the degree and extent to which that pull factor would materialize. Nonetheless, we understand that the projections are that there would be a material impact at the border.
When you look back 20 years ago, prior to the safe third country agreement, one of the reasons why the safe third country agreement was put in place was the security perimeter negotiations taking place between Canada and the United States. Those took on more force after 9/11.
One of the files that was discussed at the time was the safe third country agreement, because at that time, about a third of Canada's—