Okay.
During your presentation you talked about the bill's narrowness perhaps creating these unintended consequences. You used the word “problematic” as well. Why is it problematic? The narrowness of the bill is part of the reason I think it cleared the Senate so quickly, and I think part of the reason we're all debating it today as well. The narrowness of the bill has allowed it to sail through. Most people recognize there's a small group of lost Canadians who are impacted and that this would be a legislative way to fix an administrative problem that Parliament created after it repeatedly kept changing the Citizenship Act.
Why is it problematic?