You just mentioned an interesting point, and I'm trying to get a sense of whether it applies in the situation of the subamendment here. There have been previous attempts to clarify lost Canadians. It seems to me that any time there's a bill or a measure put in place to clarify lost Canadians, there seems to be another class of lost Canadians who come in on the back end.
Have you given any advice to the government or has the government asked for any advice in terms of, instead of continually amending the lost Canadian component, perhaps having a broader, more definitive class of what would constitute this and then drawing a line?