Okay, it's 600,000.
I want to know how this happened. How is it that I don't have the courtesy of looking at technical amendments when a third party did? I get that colleagues may discuss them among themselves. That's fine. They have that privilege, but the red line is this: We don't send these things to third parties when we're in the middle of the bill review.
I realize my colleague Ms. Kwan said there have been matters brought up before, but I don't believe we were in the middle of a bill review or clause-by-clause consideration at that time, particularly for amendments that needed a special motion in the House of Commons in order to be introduced at committee.
For those watching, what happened here is very serious. We have to protect procedure. When we don't have procedure followed, we have questions about the validity of the legislation that follows.
That would be my motion. I would add a date to the end of it as well, Madam Chair. Let's say those would be tabled by Wednesday.