I think the member is correct in the sense that the main concern is to limit or avoid unintended consequences.
As was brought up moments ago, one of the important ways to do that is to offer a mechanism for those who may need to renounce for personal, professional, legal or other reasons. As soon as a legislative remedy like this comes into force, when the beneficiary is not alive to do that, that option isn't available. Then it can have those downstream, automatic, kind of trickle-down impacts on the children, who may now be adults, particularly in this cohort that's under discussion, when we're talking about women who—well, we're talking about a pre-1947 cohort.
I'll turn to my colleague at the Department of Justice, who may wish to elaborate further.