No, I did. It was nice.
I also want to re-emphasize the comments of the department.
My understanding is that the scope this would apply to is very narrow. I understand her question: Would it apply to broader pieces of legislation? It would not. To give her an example, we have already qualified some of the other parts of the provisions in this bill with things called a “substantial presence test”. There are rules in place, so it wouldn't just.... There are rules for when it would apply, but it would be very narrow in scope.
I just wanted to make sure her concerns were taken care of prior to the vote being taken here.