You called them predatory because of the way they're using consultants. Something that both of you have said is that some of them might own some of these colleges. There's a mechanism by which they're owning and streaming people into them.
Is that part of the reason you're calling them predatory, or is it the recruitment practices in other countries? Three countries are affected that we know of: India, the People's Republic of China and Vietnam. The predatory nature of it sounds like it's just shady business practices.
The provinces are designating them as DLIs, therefore there has to be some type of verification being done. Is there no verification being done?
I'm trying to understand. Is it the business practices, or is their very existence questionable? Where's the starting point of the issues here?