Yes.
First of all, it involves striking the earlier “and” before (b), and then adding to the end “and (c) implement visa-free travel from Ukraine to Canada”.
That's largely self-explanatory, but to respond to the question that was asked about this not having been done in other cases, we have to acknowledge that it has long been the policy of the government to have visa-free travel for some countries and not for others. I don't think we would want to say that the government, in the interests of fairness, has to either have visa requirements for every country or visa requirements for no country. These determinations are made on the basis of a variety of considerations around the likely numbers that would come and the impacts that would have in terms of the speed at which it would occur, capacity and so forth.
However, in light of the current situation in Ukraine, and the fact that many comparable partner countries already have visa-free travel..... Ukrainians have the option, for instance, of travelling to many countries in Europe. Many may have family members in Canada and, therefore, may want to come to Canada as well. Visa-free travel makes sense in this particular context.
It doesn't mean we shouldn't consider it in another context, and it doesn't mean that we maybe shouldn't have done it in other contexts, but I think it makes sense under the circumstances in this particular case. That's why I'm moving this amendment.
Thank you.