Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.
It's interesting. I just pulled up, on my computer, the government website that lists companies with violations attached to them in the temporary foreign worker program. There are 79 pages on that website. I went through the first 10 pages in this short period of time and counted up the number of violations under number 9 in the code.
Number 9 states:
The pay or working conditions didn't match, or were not better than, what was listed on the offer of employment, or the job was not the same as what was listed on the offer of employment.
Each page has 10 employers. I counted 45 employers who have violated code number 9. This is the code that speaks about violating people's working conditions, or the pay. It may well be that, down the road, there are other violations listed that are just about paperwork, but paperwork is important, too, because it documents what's going on with respect to the farm. Forty-five out of 100 employers, in those first 10 pages, were in violation of pay and working conditions. There are 79 pages in total. I have not had time to go through and count them all, in this period.
To Mr. Possberg's point, the operative part is this: It doesn't matter whether you're an employee who is domestic, has full status or is a temporary foreign worker; any violation is not acceptable. In the case of temporary foreign workers, the point that is important—and why we're having this study—is the very notion that, when you're a temporary foreign worker, you don't have your rights protected. I know people will say you do in theory, but in practice you actually don't. During the COVID period, there were violations of basic working conditions so extensive that people died. They went home in body bags.
I think we need to remember this. That's why there needs to be change in the temporary foreign workers...to balance the imbalance of power that exists right now, so workers have some rights and those rights are protected.