Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I totally agree with my colleague, Mr. Drouin.
Here, Mr. Chair, the situation is as follows: With what Ms. Kwan has proposed, it's pointing fingers at both the former chair, Ms. Salma Zahid, and the analysts. I do believe that, in all ways, the analysts were doing a perfect job, and here we have a doubt of probably bad intentions, which is very serious. When we talk about a breach of privilege, that's something very serious. We're pointing fingers at the former chair and the analysts.
Due to the fact that this letter was not tabled, what is wrong if Ms. Kwan comes with a friendly proposal to rectify and adjust it according to her satisfaction? I'm not seeing anything wrong with that if we're going to be very honest in our intentions in order to bring what Ms. Kwan wants to be on the report. This is what I will say, and this leads me to believe that this should be out of order at this time, unless we solve it and rectify it on a friendly basis.
Thank you, Mr. Chair.