I'm just trying to sort out in my head here what you just told the committee, which is that we would have two separate meetings with officials. That's one with IRCC and then one with CBSA. I'm not quite sure why the committee would do that. Normally we would have officials come together at the same time. Now, instead of one meeting, we're having two meetings.
The other thing that I wanted to raise is an ongoing issue with committee members. This is that we begin many things before we finish the many things that are just sitting there. We still have, for example, the draft letter on Afghanistan that we need to finish, as an example. We do have the rapporteur piece and then we also have a couple of motions with respect to the minister appearing.
I'm hesitant to start another committee when we have so many things that are still on our agenda as unfinished business. Then, of course, we're doing it in such a way that it means having an additional meeting with respect to that study.
Could I get a clarification? I heard you say in your opening that it requires consent for us to proceed accordingly. Is that unanimous consent that's required?