The information-sharing provision in Bill C-2 isn't specific to international students, but it does provide us with enhanced integrity throughout the system.
Information is key. As we've said before, the officers are able to make an assessment only for admissibility and eligibility—which is key for a foreign national entering into Canada—based on the information that is in front of them. The information in front of them is information that's provided on the application. We collect biometrics. We do criminal assessments. We share information with our partners to see if there's any derogatory information.
As I mentioned before, one of the key pieces that is missing is our ability to share between our business lines on various applications, even if we're not talking about fraud and just talking about administrative errors. An individual filling out an application for a visitor visa may have incorrectly put in a place of birth based on what their passport said or didn't say at the time. As they progress through the process, it might be different on a permanent resident application, and we want to be able to identify that throughout the system.
We also want to be able to share information with provinces and territories, so that it not only helps facilitate for clients their ability to access provincial services and benefits, but also allows the provinces to determine whether somebody is abusing the provincial services and benefits.
Also, then, while we have information-sharing agreements with our international partners, we rely on consistent use and the Privacy Act to share with our federal partners. As we mentioned before, immigration and immigration enforcement and the borders is a joint responsibility with a number of different departments in the federal government. This would allow us to do that as well.
There are also other provisions within Bill C-2. One of them would be what we refer to as “mass authorities”. Generally, it would allow, through an order in council, an order to mass cancel, suspend or alter immigration documents that have been issued, for reasons in the public interest. “Public interest” isn't defined, because there could be various reasons that the GIC would determine that it's in the public interest. For instance, there could be a cyber-attack issuing fraudulent visas. We would want to mass cancel those. We currently don't have the ability to do that under the legislation.
It would also, finally, bring efficiencies to our asylum program. As it may pertain to individuals who are claiming asylum and are non-genuine claimants, we want to make the system more efficient and fast, and it would introduce two ineligibilities with regard to that as well.