I'll keep it short, because I want my colleague to have enough time to put all of his questions to the witness. This situation directly concerns him. I'm trying to understand why an agreement that is being negotiated would not contain directives for its implementation. We've seen this in the case of Nunavut and other communities.
Why is there a gap of sorts and why is the implementation process seemingly so complicated? Take the Cree, for example. What's missing in their case? Am I not understanding something?