There's some debate about that in the public accounts committee, which I think you may be alluding to.
My understanding is that it essentially codifies the principles and practices we're always under. It makes it very clear that there's a zone the minister is responsible for in terms of political direction and priorities and there's a zone of administration that I'm responsible for as a deputy head. It codifies that and makes it very clear. I'm responsible for the efficient management of resources, internal controls, and for the running of the department under the direction of the minister.
I think it's easier for you, as parliamentarians, to decide what to hold me to account for and what to hold the minister to account for. That works well for both of us.