I just want to add that regardless of the final shape of the bill, the operational considerations would remain. We feel that undertaking a review of any preparations would be prudent and would be really just good sense, in terms of then assessing whether there have in fact been preparations made, whether the resource issues have been properly rolled out as anticipated. It's a way to deal with those issues in a way that moves forward.
We feel our amendments would strengthen any approach that's taken and thus would also provide a stronger focus and maybe a more pointed focus for any consultation. We think this is a way to proceed, and also to do so in a way that would reduce any unintended negative impacts on communities that we have experienced from other legislation, such as Bill C-31, and from some of the other approaches. It has been assumed that these have had no impact, but in fact and in reality they have. They're not negative reflections on the content of that bill; they're just unintended and unplanned for consequences of legislative actions.