Evidence of meeting #27 for Indigenous and Northern Affairs in the 39th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was claim.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Sylvia Duquette  Executive Director, Specific Claims Reform Initiative, Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development
Robert Winogron  Senior Counsel, Department of Justice

4:50 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

4:50 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Barry Devolin

(Clauses 42 to 53 inclusive agreed to)

4:50 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Barry Devolin

We now go back to the beginning and we'll deal with clause 2 first.

(Clause 2 agreed to)

4:55 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Barry Devolin

Shall the schedule carry?

(Schedule agreed to)

4:55 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Barry Devolin

Shall clause 1, the short title, carry?

(Clause 1 agreed to)

4:55 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Barry Devolin

Turning to the preamble, if members look at their packages, on page 1 the item known as BQ-1 has been brought forward by Monsieur Lemay.

Is it your intention to move this amendment, Monsieur Lemay?

4:55 p.m.

Bloc

Marc Lemay Bloc Abitibi—Témiscamingue, QC

Yes.

4:55 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Barry Devolin

This amendment seeks to add a paragraph to the preamble providing that the act be implemented in respect with the principles set out in the political agreement between the Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development and the National Chief of the Assembly of First Nations in relation to specific claims reform, signed on November 27, 2007.

However, this agreement is not part of Bill C-30 and is not referred to in any part of the bill. The House of Commons Procedure and Practice states at page 657:

In the case of a bill that has been referred to a committee after second reading, a substantive amendment to the preamble is admissible only if it is rendered necessary by amendments made to the bill.

Furthermore, it states on page 654:

An amendment to a bill that was referred to committee after second reading is out of order if it is beyond the scope and principle of the bill.

In the opinion of the chair, the amendment introduces a substantive motion to the preamble without any changes having been made to the bill and proposes to introduce notions foreign to the bill. Consequently, I rule the amendment inadmissible.

4:55 p.m.

Bloc

Marc Lemay Bloc Abitibi—Témiscamingue, QC

Oh.

No, I do not want to challenge.

4:55 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Barry Devolin

Shall the preamble carry?

4:55 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

4:55 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Barry Devolin

Shall the title carry?

4:55 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

4:55 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Barry Devolin

Shall the bill as amended carry?

4:55 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

4:55 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Barry Devolin

Shall I report the bill, as amended, to the House?

4:55 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

4:55 p.m.

An hon. member

And as soon as possible.

4:55 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Barry Devolin

Shall the committee order a reprint of the bill?

4:55 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

5 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Barry Devolin

Well, members, what are we going to do for half an hour?

Thank you very much to the members and to the officials.

To complete a small bit of housekeeping, I would suggest that the subcommittee on the agenda meet on Monday during our regular time, from 3:30 to 5:30. The rest of the class is dismissed until further notice.

The meeting is adjourned.