Thank you very much. That went quickly for me too, if that's any consolation.
Here we are, this was all scheduled for economic development in the north, and now, of course, we have the backdrop of the NUPPA legislation being tabled yesterday, which has led us on a slightly different path here.
I'm going to go back to where others have gone—Larry and Jean—and just talk about these board appointments again. So, Stephanie, my question will probably be directed to you.
I think I comprehend the recommendations that you have made to the committee. Those were recommendations made in the context of an economic development study. Your words were very precise. You said that it was a recommendation to amend the Nunavut Land Claims Agreement. At least that's what I heard in your submission.
My understanding is that the NUPPA legislation and the way the board appointment process has been changed goes as far towards your recommendations as it can possibly go, save and except that we would have to amend the Nunavut Land Claims Agreement, and the only way we could do that is if we had agreement from NTI. You may not have had time to study the legislation enough, but does that seem a reasonable proposition, that yes, there are some things that can't be accomplished without amending the land claims agreement in the NUPPA legislation?